Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02117
Original file (BC 2014 02117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02117
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, Item 30, Remarks, be corrected to reflect 
“Vietnam-Yes.” 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Da Nang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam and Dong Ha Air 
Base, Republic of Vietnam.

The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider 
his untimely application because he is a 20 percent disabled 
veteran and it is imperative the correct information is updated in 
his records.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Department of Veterans Affairs rating decision.

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

In a letter dated 26 November 2014, AFPC/DPAPP verified and 
confirmed that the applicant had boots on the ground Foreign 
Service time at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, from 
29 December 1968 to 28 June 1970, for 1 year and 6 months.  While 
assigned to Clark AB, he was sent on Temporary Duty (TDY) to Da 
Nang Air Base and Dong Ho Air Base, Republic of Vietnam from 
14 October 1969 to 19 October 1969.  No additional Foreign Service 
will be awarded for this period since it was performed from 
another overseas location.  In addition, Item 30 of his DD Form 
214 will remain as “Vietnam-No,” since he must have been assigned 
in a permanent status rather than a TDY status.  The amount of 
Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct.  The 
letter also stated that specific locations are not annotated on a 
member's DD Form 214.  As such, he was advised to use their letter 
as proof of “boots on ground” for the Republic of the Philippines 
and the Republic of Vietnam.



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.  AFM 35-5, Separation Documents and 
General Separation Procedures, Table 2, Item 29, states to list 
Yes or No when “PCS (Permanent Change of Station) assignment to 
Indochina, Vietnam, or Korea.”  While the applicant’s records 
reflect that he went TDY to Vietnam, there is no evidence in his 
record that he performed a PCS to Vietnam.

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 26 January 2015, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the 
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant 
has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.



The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 9 April 2015, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02117 was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, 16 June 2014, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 12 December 2014.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 January 2015.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385

    Original file (BC-2012-01385.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00726

    Original file (BC-2012-00726.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although he has been unable to provide copies of travel vouchers in support of his request, it is our opinion that the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to persuade us that he served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots on the ground in Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam, from 21 Mar 1972 through 20...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04995

    Original file (BC 2013 04995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04995 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT NDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) assignments to Thailand, Guam, (Hawaii, Philippines) - Administratively Corrected, and Okinawa. A review of his records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that substantiate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03549

    Original file (BC-2012-03549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03549 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Southeast Asia from 10 Jul 67 through 11 Jan 68. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00536

    Original file (BC 2013 00536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He has documentation from a fellow service member who served in Vietnam with him who experienced a similar problem regarding his service in Vietnam, and how his records were corrected by the Air Force. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01863

    Original file (BC 2014 01863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01863 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change the remarks in block 30, to reflect “VIETNAM-YES.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with one Bronze Service Star (VSM w/1BSS), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM); therefore, block...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03043

    Original file (BC-2013-03043.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03043 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s master personnel records failed to provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. In view of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00337

    Original file (BC-2012-00337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00337 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. While assigned to Clark Air Base, he performed a TDY assignment to Taiwan; however, the exact amount of time served in Taiwan could not be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05757

    Original file (BC 2013 05757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, notarized statements from members who attest to his service in Vietnam, photographs and various other documents related to his request. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He requested a copy of his records from St. Louis; however, when he received his records, included were documents from another military member. The DVA accepted the statements from his...